Close Please enter your Username and Password
Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
Password reset link sent to
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service

posts

Member Deleted Post


This post has been deleted by

Fella_ 113M
309 posts
4/1/2015 8:24 pm



This whole legislation thing is catering to such a narrow group. I read an excellent explanation of how the newest versions are very different, by including corporations alongside persons. Also, Indiana lacks other protection elements. So, the common storyline defense was pre-written, claiming that Clinton and Obama supported the exact same thing. They wrote the defense a year ago, y'know?
by Chris Good
search: story religious-freedom-difference-indianas-law/story?id=30019729



<--- shortened his name to Fella_


cuzisaid 53F  
14988 posts
4/3/2015 3:22 pm

Youd look amazing in lavender.

I vote we make a new law above the mason dixon protecting potential male lavender lovers who have been excluded from walmart ads because st mattress didnt wear pink polka dots.

Sometimes I make a move, sorry to leave my home, but hope I will find another of equal character.
At night I gaze at the starry mass with no idea to which one the earth attached.
May'be that cute little one over there or that one that sits alone in the inky black
.
~~ 'My place amongst the stars' c/o former member SPB ~~



Become a member to comment on this blog