Close Please enter your Username and Password
Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
Password reset link sent to
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service

likesmatureones 55M
0 posts
11/29/2016 5:01 am
Why banning guns won't work..the ohio state tragedy


I have long said that banning guns or increasing background checks won't prevent nut jobs from killing people,

Sure a gun is the weapon of choice for these asshats.. Why? because it is an easy way for someone undersized ( which apparently alot of these people are) to cause alot of harm.

But I can think of 3 incidences where people used cars to kill students instead of a gun..if you can't get a gun then wait for people to gather and then just run them over....like the ohio state incident yesterday.

and let's face it... even someone with deep psychological problems/on meds/seeing a shrink can legally drive!/can own a car

That " sideshow bob" idiot could still drive! ( and he told his shrink he had thoughts of killing people)...
and I seriously wonder why isn't there more restrictions put on these people...why are they still allowed to drive?

and why isn't this ohio state story getting major league play....oh wait.. it's not some white guy with a gun ( with some ties to the tea party perhaps)?
...it's some somali "immigrant" with a car killing people..

Well you won't hear our president talking about that one today.. ( no this isn't obama bashing.. he is the PRESIDENT and needs to address this issue because he waded into the other shootings in america. Obama won't because the killer was black and an immigrant.
NOPE nothing to see here folks..nothing to see.

You known damn well there will be no investigation/ no calling this guy a terrorist.
Funny last time I looked killing multiple people for some form of glory is TERRORISM

I am also pissed when the universities throw around the term " active shooter"...which means there is someone with a gun... it seems like it is now a catch all phrase for any wackadoo killing someone...

If you legally had a gun on you ( ohio is an open carry state) at that moment, you'd have cops literally knocking you to the ground..
..a citizen obeying the law getting bum rushed by the police because the university doesn't have another word for a nutballer without a gun.

He is deemed "dangerous" because the citizen decides to protect himself???
He would be instantly reported to the police by student when the "active shooter on campus" text by the university went out..

Why? cause we have been conditioned that anyone with a gun is a nut!

There was no gun at the Ohio U incident( despite reports by students that they heard shots!!!...like OMG.. I know..embellish much for the media ).
The guy at OSU ran people over and got out with a machete... ( should we put bans on them too?/where is the background check on edged weapons?)

This is basically fear mongering and conditioning the next generation to be anti gun.. if there is a criminal in like a ten block radius of a school .. it goes on "lockdown"..
Why? is it because he is a criminal ? nope..it's the assumption he has a gun

People just assume a society without guns is great.. hell watch any foreign video of a hold up....the robber will use knives/clubs/bats etc to rob the 7-11 type clerk.. if someone wants to commit violence and can't get a gun...

well they will use what is handy...

Terrorist will use what is handy... the dirka dirka brothers in boston used a freaking pressure cooker build off a design in a isis magazine ( hardly high tech)....sideshow bob booby trapped his own apartment..

So lets stop the shandyhook BS of banning guns...ironically that idiot drove to the school and could have easily just ran over the when school let out.

Instead perhaps we need to bite the bullet and try to get these people help

Let's stop stereotyping people that legally carry weapons. Hell I'd gladly sit next to someone at a diner sporting a gun ( I'd probably end up buying the dude lunch).
I feel safe with someone open carrying or concealed carrying a gun.

These aren't the boogeymen we need to be afraid of...but it is just easier to blame guns ( and those that legally carry them) than the nutjobs using the guns.

Why cause no one wants to address the real problem! NOONE wants to blame the killer/ noone wants to address the mental health conditions in america/you literally have to pry the words "terrorist" out of the president's lips.

It is just easier to try to ban guns...what's next? cars

likesmatureones 55M

11/29/2016 5:02 am


brandygirasol 54T
9346 posts
11/29/2016 5:23 am

....Ans Soooooooo That Is One Of The Many Reasons Why We Voted For A NEW Sheriff In Town Called.... Ta Da.... Donald J Trump!


brandygirasol 54T
9346 posts
11/29/2016 5:56 am

VLAD Honey Those Are Good Odds Unless You Happen To Be The Unlucky Victim Who Runs Into That Particular Crazy Somali Muslim Jihadi Percentage Point!


likesmatureones 55M

11/29/2016 7:05 am

My whole point wasn't to bann people or to make broad assumptions. I don't wish that for foreigners and I certainly don't want it for law abiding citizens legally carrying weapons. I'm just saying we need to stop assuming some is dangerous because omg they carry a gun. Everyone at Kansas u is going nuts because state law now allows people to arm themselves on campus


marshamay 35F
5929 posts
11/29/2016 9:45 am

It was a campus cop WITH A GUN that stopped the freak , just sayin.


marshamay 35F
5929 posts
11/29/2016 10:05 am

    Quoting wandering1975:
    Marshamay, if that was for me please read my post more carefully. I'm advocating zero power for the government to restrict anything. Including guns. Just pointing out the fact that an assault weapon, which I don't think the government should have any authority to regulate, would have caused much more damage. We have to get used to living in a free society where people die for that freedom in our backyards, not only 2,000 miles away in a desert. I may die for that freedom. Glad to do it.
No , it wasn't aimed at anyone , There are so many instances where if someone had a gun besides the attacker , they may have saved many lives . This , thankfully was one such . Also this particular loser was following an ISIS directive , recently issued. Not a "gun nut ".


brandygirasol 54T
9346 posts
11/29/2016 10:19 am

MARSHAMAY1975 Overwelming Us With Common Sense BRAVO


marshamay 35F
5929 posts
11/29/2016 2:13 pm

    Quoting brandygirasol:
    MARSHAMAY1975 Overwelming Us With Common Sense BRAVO
i'm no rocket surgeon , but damn ,


likesmatureones 55M

11/29/2016 4:38 pm

the problem is the government can't get rid of the guns, so they go after the gun culture.

I grew up with guns..everyone I knew had a rifle/shotgun and probably a pistol in their house ( and no I didn't grow up in the south).
I have no problem with guns...never saw anyone use one in a drive by or to rob a bank etc.

It just seems like law abiding folks who carry guns..OMG!!!! don't break the law.(imagine that!!!!...).
. yet the government treat gun owners like they are the real domestic terrorist



Become a member to comment on this blog