|
HAPPY NEW YEAR?
|
Jan 1, 2007 8:04 pm
155 Views
|
2006 was a very mixed bag but allot of changes. The Warden & I split. Three friends of mine died way too young, one of them a very close friend. Work has been a pain in the ass. My baseball league was also a pain in the ass. On the positive side, I have met allot of new people and had more sex this year than with the Warden for the past three years. So you know why the Warden and I split. LOL! Made more money through work and investments. So those things are up! LOL
Most people look to the New Year with great hope and expectation, I'm looking forward to the new year with great dread. Allot of things is coming to ahead which not all good
The Warden still stating taking my kids to Puerto Rico in July. I do have one more time to coach them in baseball, while at first I thought I did not. So I should be thankful for that.
And even if out marriage is over, I will badly miss the Warden when she goes.
I may finally shake off THE Neighbor since she and her soon not-to-be-married boyfriend she stole seems to be staying together and also I'm very tired how she treats me. So this is good news.
Other stuff from work and family that I see on the horizon is not all good either.
Is there a silver lining in the clouds and the storms that are coming towards me in 2007? Will I survive?
I must.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
|
WILL BABYSIT FOR SEX!
|
Dec 28, 2006 11:29 pm
158 Views
|
I don't think I should share this since this a great gig.
Okay, I will.
You know the old porno movie plot....the daddy bangs the young hot babysitter...but this is in reverse.
I have been playing with these two ladies who have kids and work sometimes late at night to early morning. They also need someone to watch there kid while they are at work. Paying and finding someone that late is hard to find and expensive. So they call on me when they need my "services".
I get the kids in their beds and when they come home, I'm in mommy's bed when they come home..
Pretty good. See the big grin ear to ear.
So ladies, do you need any babysitting? You know where to reach me.
<====== one of the moms who is very satisfied of my services
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, but women are dependent on men
|
Dec 5, 2006 12:45 pm
249 Views
|
Sorry, but women are dependent on men
By DR NICK NEAVE
We live in an age in which women have earned complete independence. So do they need men at all? According to Dr NICK NEAVE, an evolutionary psychologist from Northumbria University, not only do they need men, they are fundamentally programmed to depend on them. Here, Dr Neave, 41, explains his provocative thesis:
You're a successful woman with a job to die for, a fabulous home and a supportive husband, but do you ever get the urge to check his mobile phone for love messages? Or his bank statements for intimate meals a deux that you didn't share? And do you lie awake at night worrying how you'll cope if the worst happens, your fears are proved and your husband walks out?
Don't worry. Your suspicion is only natural. At the risk of sounding extraordinarily sexist, I'm convinced that women, even in the happiest of relationships, are programmed to worry their men are going to abandon them.
And they're terrified - in a way that most men find it frankly impossible to imagine. What's more, if their forebodings come true, women are more inclined to forgive an affair than a man if the shoe is on the other foot. That's not because they're nicer, more easygoing individuals. It's simply because their primeval urge to hang onto a male provider is so strong.
Women in the 21st century may boast that they are truly independent for the first time in our social history. They may tell themselves and each other that they don't need a man. They can even start a family on their own thanks to IVF techniques.
But, while feminists may argue this proves women have finally kicked off the shackles of dependence on men, I'm afraid they're wrong.
In evolutionary terms the huge cultural changes over the past generation amount simply to the merest blink of an eye. It could take another 10,000 years for women to change their thinking.
Quite simply, women are preprogrammed to feel dependent on men. Even today women may be richer and enjoy all the trappings of success but, deep down in their psyche, they fear they can't survive alone.
These women may be shooting up the career ladder and earning more than the men in their lives, but when it comes to relationships men still hold the trump card.
As an evolutionary psychologist, I study patterns of behaviour dating back to the first human societies, and constantly analyse evidence that demonstrates the key differences which have developed between the sexes since men were hunter-gatherers and women were child bearers.
Females are smaller and weaker than males so, in prehistoric times, women and their offspring were prone to being the victims of predators, and violence.
They needed the support and protection of men who didn't just have brute force but also had social status in the group, either through their sheer physicality or the strength of their personality.
That's why women still look for a mate of higher social standing.
If a woman had a relationship with a socially dominant male, she would immediately get greater access to resources because her social standing would be elevated, too.
As we shall see, modern surveys consistently show that women today ape those inherent characteristics by looking for partners who are socially dominant and have the respect of their peers, paying close attention to how men interact with, and are treated by, other men.
Men have a different reason for choosing a mate. The caveman needed to be sure he was raising a child who was genetically his. The best way of doing this was to secure a mate and guard her so she didn't get the chance to stray.
A man's natural instinct may be to have sex with a different woman every day, but to safeguard his relationship (and secure his progeny), he has been forced into a pattern of monogamy. don't even realise what's happening. When couples meet at speed-dating evenings, typically a man will judge a woman on her looks and youth. His priorities are whether she's healthy, interested in sex and can give him children one day. He doesn't care how much she earns or her social status.
Typically, however, a woman's first question will be: 'What job do you do?' It sounds a friendly overture, but what she really wants to know is his social position and earning capacity. Is he an industrious, hard worker, capable of providing for her and their children?
Because of his power, even the ugliest politician on the planet has women lining up to go to bed with him. Were he the local rat catcher, his love life would be a good deal quieter. As American statesman Henry Kissinger put it: 'Power is the ultimate aphrodisiac.'
One might argue that it's only natural for today's women in their 30s or 40s to feel dependent on a man. After all, the vast majority were raised by mothers who by and large didn't have careers and were forced to rely financially on their husbands.
Yet study after study proves that today's women in their 20s are just as insecure. In a recent study, two American researchers, John Marshall Townsend from Syracuse University and Gary Levy from the University of Toledo, presented women with photographs of men.
The first group, described as doctors, wore designer ties, smart shirts and sported Rolex watches. The second wore plain shirts and Swatch watches and were described as teachers. The third group wore Burger King uniforms.
Women repeatedly picked doctors as potential boyfriends - even though many of the men in the third category were actually more handsome. Quite simply, to women a man's looks are less important than earning power and social standing.
In another study, male and female medical students were asked to pick their ideal mate from a selection of careers. The majority of men chose nurses. Women, however, picked hospital consultants. This demonstrates that, although every bit as financially successful as their male colleagues, these young women still feel they need men to confer power and social standing to a superior male.
It's no surprise to me that another study this year by sociologists at Virginia University found that couples are happiest in traditional marriages run on old-fashioned gender lines, where the man is the main breadwinner. The report showed conclusively that women who worked were more dissatisfied with their husbands than those who stayed at home.
One of the experts, W Radford Wilcox, said: 'Regardless of what married women say they believe about gender, they tend to have happier marriages when their husband is a good provider.'
Happiest of all were women whose husbands brought in at least two-thirds of the household income, regardless of how much they helped with domestic chores.
In short I suspect women will never feel truly comfortable earning more than their men. The need to rely on a man is driven by such a deep-seated biological urge, I cannot see it ever being eradicated completely.
Only last week, a survey by the Skipton Building Society concluded that many women who are the main breadwinner hold it against their partner for contributing less to the household budget than they do.
While those women might like the material rewards of their high salaries, they also dislike the financial responsibility - perhaps reflectingthe inbuilt genetic imperative to rely on someone else.
It is that instinctive need to rely on a man which makes women so afraid of abandonment. Perhaps that is why women are more attuned to their partner's moods and curious about tiny aspects of his life. And they are much better than men at spotting liars.
Evolutionary psychologists are convinced that these are in part throwbacks to a woman's need to maintain her relationship at all costs.
It's completely irrational for women, who can earn as much as men, to have a terror of being abandoned. Even if she can't work, the welfare state means she's not going to starve. Yet it's a real fear for many women. We have anecdotal evidence of women lying awake at night worrying how they'd cope.
Women are terrified of abandonment. They fear a drop in status or social standing that might come with divorce in a way men - who are driven by very different priorities - simply don't understand.
Even extremely wealthy, successful women have these vestigial anxieties which bear absolutely no relation to the reality of their lives, but are throwbacks to caveman society.
Ironically, although men actually fare less well after divorce and are often less happy, women typically are more frightened of living alone.
Men find it extremely hard to forgive an affair. This dates back to early man's horror of unwittingly raising another man's child. However, women are predisposed to be more tolerant of affairs. It comes down to brutal economics. The thought of your husband having sex with another woman may be devastating. But even worse is the prospect of him pouring all his financial resources her way.
Quite simply, women are so programmed to feel dependent that their subliminal urge to safeguard the home often outweighs the fury of being sexually betrayed.
Terror of being abandoned even drives the beauty industry. Eating clinics report a four-fold rise in the number of middle-aged women seeking help for anorexia and bulimia because they're desperate to look slim and youthful. These problems were once the province of teenage girls.
And while women may claim they are having cosmetic surgery and Botox treatments purely to feel better about themselves, I believe the reason is much more complex. Women are driven by a primeval urge to keep their men by looking youthful and fertile. Sexist? Maybe. True? I fear so.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
|
9 OUT OF 10 TIMES I GET MY FACE SLAPPED, BUT THAT 10TH TIME....
|
Nov 27, 2006 4:51 pm
223 Views
|
A friend of mine made a blog entry(interesting...) about an encounter at the mall.
Ok...another day in the life of a woman. I'm at the mall today and some guys says "would you like to exchange numbers with me" So I politely smile as usual and say "no thank you, i'm married" Then I proceeded to walk away. He continues to follow me with questions "if you're married, where's the ring?" I stop in the middle of the very crowded mall and say loudly "I don't wear my ring bc idiots tried to take my hand off to steal it once...I told you i'm happily married now back off!!" You would think this would deter him...and he said to me "well my cock is 11" and that has to be bigger than his...you don't want this in you? Your loss honey"
See my point on penis size? He thought for sure he'd walk away w/my number and what gave him this false sense of "i'm the pimp" confidence? think children...it's not a hard concept. His alledged large penis is what told his brain he can have any woman he wants, simply bc he has the alledged 'large penis'. I rest my case
I replied:
No, he is doing the simple 1 out of 10. Let me explain, 9 out of 10 times women would give the same reaction as you. a little harsher or a little easier, but basically saying, BACK OFF. But there will be one woman out of ten that WILL give him his number and more likely will fuck him.
Hey, I have tried this, and if you can stand the rejections, it works. Although I do not have a 11" cock, I WILL fuck you twice!
So ladies, you understand now why a guy is doing this? He will find that needy woman in the group of 10 women.
Soon she will be doing this as stated in the above picture.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
|
RULES ARE MADE TO BE BROKEN!
|
Nov 20, 2006 6:42 pm
164 Views
|
As you know, students, I'm separated but living in the same house with the Warden (at least till June) and we are both allow to play outside. But there is a rule, do not bring it in the house.
So the warden and the kids went to New York. I thought I will have a wonderful weekend of working, cleaning the house, laundry, and painting the hallway.
Then I get a call from a kitten on Saturday who been wanted to play with me that she would be in my area tonight. But where can we play? Hmmmmmmm.
Why not here, home! So I called her back and told her directions to my house and set up the time. We would go to dinner, make it a short nice evening because she been working since 4am
Later I was talking to another female friend. Well she had a "client" who was offering big bucks to suddenly "work" with him later this Saturday night, BUT she can't get a sitter for her kid. She's a good friend and I know she needs the bucks and I would be free later that Saturday night but I told her that I'll be playing earlier with the new kitten. "Sure, bring him over after 9pm," I said.
"We can make this work!" she replied.
I had a wonderful time with the new kitten, but she had to leave at 9pm because she had to be at work 5am next day.
Finally my another female friend came by 9:30pm to drop her kid off. We played video games and I worked a little and the kid fell asleep around 12:30.
My another female friend came back about 1am and over rum & cokes we talked about how she abuse, I mean worked, with this young "client" and the latest drama from THE Neighbor.
"Since you did me a favor, it's your turn," she said putting her drink down and and grabbing my crouch. So I spent the rest of the evening chaining her to my bed and fucking her up the ass. It was quite relaxing night for both of us.
So, student, today's lesson are:
1) RULES ARE MADE TO BE BROKEN.
2) WHEN YOU BRAKE A RULE, JUST DON'T BRAKE IT, SMASH IT INTO A MILLION PIECES!
If you see a white guy running down your block and behind him a Puerto Rican woman with a machete in her hand.....it's me and the warden. Say hi as I streak past you.
Before everyone get on their high horse here, remember I'm mad, bad, and dangerous to know.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
|
"Jealous?" I said.
|
Nov 14, 2006 3:06 pm
166 Views
|
THE Neighbor does not want to go to the next Silk & Skin Party, so I said, okay, I might be taking someone else then. There was a moment of silence and then THE Neighbor said, "I don't like that."
"Jealous?" I said.
"Yes," she said.
"Well," I said, "You have your married boy. I'm not sitting at home waiting for you what to do with him."
I like my new sexy young friend, and every time I'm with her, and THE Neighbor knows I'm with her, she calls and texts me more than usual.
Hey, she had her chance. Not ruling out in the future, but my attitude is...whatever.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
|
Caffeinated drinks increase endurance
|
Oct 25, 2006 1:42 pm
206 Views
|
October 22, 2006
Caffeinated drinks increase endurance during long events such as a marathon, triathalon or bicycle race. A study from the University of Birmingham in England shows that caffeine helps the body use more carbohydrates from drinks that you take during exercise (Journal of Applied Physiology, June 2006). Those who took sugared drinks with caffeine were able to absorb and use 26 percent more of the ingested sugar than those who took the same drinks without caffeine.
Previous studies show that caffeine helps athletes run faster in both short and long-distance races. In short races, it makes athletes faster by causing the brain to send messages along nerves to cause a greater percentage of muscle fibers to contract at the same time. In longer races, it delays fatigue by preserving stored muscle sugar. Muscles get their energy from sugar and fat in the bloodstream, and from sugar, fat and protein stored in the muscles. When muscles run out of their stored sugar, they hurt and become more difficult to coordinate. Caffeine causes muscles to burn more fat, thus sparing stored muscle sugar to delay fatigue.
Nobody really knows how much caffeine you can take in without harming yourself. At rest, caffeine is a diuretic, but during exercise it does not increase urination. Caffeine is a potent stimulant that can cause irregular heartbeats in people who already have heart disease, and raise blood pressure in people with hypertension. Most research shows that it doesn't take much more than one or two soft drinks to increase endurance. Caffeine loses its beneficial effects with repeated exposure, so athletes who want to gain maximum advantage from caffeine during competition should avoid drinking caffeinated beverages when they are not exercising.
|
|
|
0
Comments
|
|
To link to this blog (Phineas2005) use [blog Phineas2005] in your messages.
|
|
|
| Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
| |
1
|
21
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
Recent Visitors
| AngelInFlight | 48 | F | 10/24 |
| kondrad | 32 | M | 6/13 |
|
